Chief Justice John Roberts just hit the brakes—at least temporarily—on a legal injustice involving a Maryland man, Kilmar, according to ABC News, Armando Abrego Garcia, who was mistakenly deported to El Salvador by the U.S. government. The Supreme Court issued a last-minute administrative stay, delaying a court-ordered deadline to bring Abrego Garcia back to the U.S. by Monday, April 7, 2025, at 11:59 p.m.
The Trump administration had asked the Supreme Court to intervene after lower courts ordered the government to fix its error and bring Abrego Garcia back. This stay from Roberts doesn’t mean the court is siding with anyone—it just buys more time to figure things out.
The government admits they deported Abrego Garcia by mistake. Despite having legal protections, he was detained by ICE, held in Texas, and then sent to El Salvador—where he ended up in one of the country’s most infamous mega-prisons. All of this happened while he was living in Maryland with his U.S. citizen wife and their five-year-old kid.
Let’s rewind a bit: Abrego Garcia came to the U.S. in 2011 when he was 16, fleeing gang violence in El Salvador. His attorney, Simon Sandoval-Moshenberg, says the gang claims are false and should be handled by an immigration judge—not ICE agents or presidential politics.
The Supreme Court gave Abrego Garcia’s legal team until Tuesday at 5 p.m. to respond to the Trump administration’s arguments. No word yet on how the justices will ultimately rule, but all eyes are on them as the clock ticks.
Rep. Rich McCormick (R-Ga.), who supports the White House‘s freeze on federal aid that could affect school lunch programs, suggested in a CNN interview that children could get fast food jobs to cover their lunch costs. He spoke about President Trump’s recent executive order to pause federal grants for review and prioritization.
The White House Office of Management and Budget issued a memo on Monday to temporarily halt all federal financial assistance activities. This freeze was set to start Tuesday at 5 p.m. ET, but U.S. District Judge Loren L. AliKhan blocked the action just before it was to take effect, with the new deadline set for February 3.
In an interview prior to the judge’s ruling, CNN anchor Pamela Brown highlighted that the Head Start program, which aids low-income families with food insecurities, might be impacted by the freeze. McCormick’s respondedby saying,
“Before I was even 13 years old, I was picking berries in the field before (the) child labor laws that precluded that. I was a paper boy, and when I was in high school, I worked my entire way through,”
McCormick told Brown.
McCormick stated that the pause on federal funds will enable the government to
“see where is the money really being spent.”
McCormick said during the interview,
“Who can actually go and actually produce their own income? Who can actually go out there and do something that makes them have value and work skills for the future?”
The congressman expanded on his child labor comments saying,
“How many people got their start in fast-food restaurants when they were kids, versus just giving a blanket rule that gives all kids lunches in high school who are capable of going out and actually getting a job…”
He went on to say that children should be
“thinking about their future instead of thinking about how they’re going to sponge out the government when they don’t need to.”
Renowned activist Malcolm X’s daughters have announced their $100 million lawsuit against some government agencies. The family had earlier announced their intention to sue in early 2023. Malcolm X’s daughters alleged on Friday, Nov. 15, 2024, that these agencies contributed to their father’s death. They also claimed that the agencies played a role in their late father’s death. Additionally, they disclosed that their father’s assassination caused great distress for his family.
Malcolm X’s Daughters File $100 Million Lawsuit
On Friday, three of Malcolm X’s daughters stood with their attorney, Benjamin Crump. They brought a $100 million lawsuit against the New York Police Department, CIA, FBI, and others. The lawsuit was filed at the Manhattan federal court. In their claims, they accused the agencies of contributing to their father’s assassination in 1965. The ladies claimed that agencies knew about the plan to murder Malcolm X but failed to protect him. They also accused the agencies of participating in the murder plot.
Ilyasah Shabazz, one of the sisters, said at the press conference held on Friday that they discovered evidence to prove the NYPD and FBI were actively involved in Malcolm X’s death. She added that they were doing the lawsuit on behalf of their mother, Betty Shabazz, who passed away 27 years ago.
Malcolm X’s Death
A pregnant Betty was at the scene where her husband was shot 21 times. Her daughters were there, too, and they witnessed their father being murdered at the age of 39 by a group of men. Malcolm X was assassinated on Feb. 21, 1965, at the Audobon Ballroom on West 165th Street in Manhattan. The activist was there to deliver a speech to hundreds of people.
Malcolm X was a Muslim minister and human rights activist who championed the cause of African Americans. He was born in Nebraska as Malcolm Little but changed his name to El-Hajj Malik El-Shabazz. He was a member of the Nation of Islam until he publicly renounced his membership. Consequently, he started getting death threats. Three members of the organization were arrested after his death, although two of them were later acquitted and released. They also got a $36 million settlement.
Government Agencies Allegedly Covered up His Death
Benjamin Crump, attorney for Malcolm X’s family, revealed that the lawsuit accuses authorities of covering up details about Malcolm’s death. The family’s lawyers claimed that two of Malcolm X’s bodyguards were arrested and jailed a week before the activist’s death. They accused the officers of trapping them to ensure Malcolm’s assassination was successful. Lawyers further noted that federal agents were in the room but didn’t protect the murdered activist. They also said authorities withheld information from the minister’s family.
This included information on informants and agents and what the agencies knew about the attack. The “entire family have suffered the pain of the unknown” for decades, the lawsuit read.
“They did not know who murdered Malcolm X, why he was murdered, the level of NYPD, FBI and CIA orchestration, the identity of the governmental agents who conspired to ensure his demise, or who fraudulently covered-up their role. The damage caused to the Shabazz family is unimaginable, immense, and irreparable.”
The NYPD, CIA, Department of Justice and the FBI have not commented on the accusation since Malcolm X’s family announced the lawsuit. Hopefully, the truth about his assassination is finally revealed, and the family can get justice.
#Clique, what do you think about Malcolm X’s daughters’ lawsuit against the security agencies? Let us know your thoughts in the comments.
Nancy Pelosi, a prominent and influential figure in American politics, has had a long and distinguished career. However, as discussions about her potential re-election in 2024 emerge, it is essential to objectively examine the factors that could influence her decision, including health concerns, age, and the importance of fresh leadership within the Democratic Party.
One of the primary concerns surrounding Pelosi’s potential re-election is her age. Born on March 26, 1940, she will be 84 years old in 2024. While age itself is not a definitive indicator of a person’s ability to serve effectively, the role of Speaker of the House demands a high level of energy, agility, and adaptability. Critics argue that advancing age might affect Pelosi’s capacity to meet the dynamic challenges of modern American politics adequately.
Additionally, Pelosi’s husband, Paul Pelosi, has faced health issues in recent years. Her dedication to her family and caregiving responsibilities are commendable, but they can pose a significant burden when combined with the demands of a high-profile political career. Concerns about her ability to fully focus on her responsibilities as Speaker of the House while tending to her husband’s health are valid.
Advocates for generational change argue that political office should not be confined to long-serving incumbents. Instead, they emphasize the importance of fostering a diverse range of voices, including younger leaders who can bring fresh perspectives and innovative solutions to the forefront. They contend that this approach is vital to maintaining the Democratic Party’s relevance and adaptability.
Pelosi’s potential retirement should be viewed within the context of the lessons learned from the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg (RBG). Despite facing health challenges, RBG chose not to retire during the Obama administration, and her passing in 2020 had profound consequences. The Democratic Party should consider the importance of timely transitions of power to ensure continuity and effective leadership.
While the discussion surrounding Pelosi’s potential retirement is ongoing, it is critical to highlight the importance of an orderly succession plan within the Democratic Party. Identifying and nurturing emerging leaders who can step into key roles is essential for maintaining the party’s strength and effectiveness.
According To African News, Gabon’s government announced a nationwide curfew and cut off internet access Saturday evening as voting in major national elections was wrapping up. The Central African nation’s communications minister, Rodrigue Mboumba Bissawou, said on state television that there would be a nightly curfew from 7 p.m. to 6 a.m. He said internet access was being restricted indefinitely, saying there had been calls for violence and the spreading of disinformation. The announcement came after voters cast ballots to elect new local leaders, national legislators and Gabon’s next president.
Incumbent President Ali Bongo Ondimba was seeking a third seven-year term and to continue a 55-year political dynasty. Bongo came to power in 2009 after the death of his father, Omar Bongo, who ruled the country for 41 years. Bongo, 64, won his current term in office by a narrow margin in 2016 amid violent protests. This year, the opposition united in favor of his main challenger, economics professor Albert Ondo Ossa, one week before Saturday’s elections. Around 847,000 people were eligible to cast ballots Saturday. Voters in Libreville, Gabon’s capital, complained of polling stations opening late. Voting was scheduled to begin in the morning, but many election sites had failed to open as of 2 p.m.
“Voters must benefit from the 10-hour period provided for by electoral law,”
Said Paulette Missambo, who withdrew from the presidential race in favor of Ossa, an independent candidate. Ossa’s platform revolves around breaking Gabon out of the status quo. He said that if elected, he would dissolve the National Assembly, redraw the electoral map and organize a new legislative election, with a goal of forming a government committed to addressing economic inequality.
“Sixty years in power is too much. I’m not afraid of President Bongo,”
Ossa said after casting his ballot at a Libreville school on Saturday afternoon. In anticipation of post-electoral violence, many people in the capital went to visit family in other parts of the country or left Gabon altogether. Others stockpiled food or bolstered security in their homes.
In September of 2021, Texas Governor Gregg Abbott signed Senate Bill 6, a bill banning the release of people accused of violent crimes on personal bonds. Instead, the accused will be able to post the amount of cash set by the court, or pay a percentage to a bail bonds company, The Texas Tribune explains.
“SB 6 is built on right-wing hysteria that violates Texans’ rights, not on public safety,” Laquita Garcia with the Texas Organizing Project said in a statement. “If implemented, this bill will lead to more overcrowding in jails and further criminalize poverty in our state, meaning more Texans- a disproportionate amount being Black and Latino, will stay stuck in jail solely because they cannot afford bail.”
Last Friday, 43-year-old Aubrey Taylor appeared at a bond hearing for assault and kidnapping charges. He’s accused of holding his victim in his car for several days and repeatedly choking her and beating her, Fox 26 Houston reported. Despite him being a violent offender, he was given a mere $1 cash bond.
“You’ve got eight prior felony convictions, two of them for robbery,” said Andy Kahan with Crime Stoppers. “He’s charged with two serious violent offenses. If I’m outraged, I can’t imagine what the victim in this case must be going through considering all she did.”
Judge Josh Hill, who gave the bond, says he was making his feelings known for the Senate Bill 6. Despite his seemingly good intentions, he’s now put the life of Taylor’s victim in danger in the process of his protesting.
“Someone has accused you, you’re in jail, you’re angry, who’s the person you’re thinking about,” questions criminal defense attorney Emily Detoto. “Who are you fuming over and who’s the first person you want to go be angry with? It’s the person who put you there, right? That needs to be rethought.”
